Legal Blockchain Framework
Claim 1: In order to
persist into the future, all organisms, humans included must survive long
enough to pass along their genes
(Darwin 1859).
Claim 2: Memetics, or the handing down
of behaviors also contributes to an individual’s probability of survival (Dawkins 1976).
Claim 3: If humanity is to
maintain justice, laws such
as tripartite Law
of the United States that compel individuals to behave are required.
Claim 4: The tripartite
legal structure of the United States includes “Tribal
Laws,” e.g., Kowalski 2009.
Claim 5: Cryptocurrency
perpetuity depends on individual blockchain participants
maintaining their private keys
on an individual basis.
Claim 6: Plaintiffs, with the
assistance of attorneys
initiate legal cases against criminal or civil defendants.
Claim 7: Typically,
attorneys require the payment of a retainer agreement fee
prior to filing a case on behalf of a plaintiff.
Claim 8: Plaintiffs who
lack the financial resources necessary to retain an attorney are at a justice
disadvantage (Buckwalter-Poza
2016).
Claim 9: Some attorneys
file and try cases on a contingency-fee
basis for plaintiff clients who lack adequate financial resources.
Claim 10: A smart contract among
plaintiff, attorney, witnesses, and other stakeholders has the potential to
build trust.
Claim 11: A
cryptocurrency-based smart contract among plaintiff, attorney, among witnesses [“Stakeholders”]
can bridge funding gaps.
Claim 12: Oracle-based smart-contract blockchains can
provide Stakeholders with a means of preserving tribal genetics and
memetics.
posted by Bradley Edward Layton PhD PE @ 10:00 PM
0 Comments
